January 29, 2010

33) Bloomberg

Bloomberg logo

wēi  danger

In 1981, Michael Bloomberg was fired from Salomon Brothers, where he was a General Partner.  He used his $10 million severance package to found Innovative Market Systems (subsequently renamed Bloomberg LLP) with the help of 2 former co-workers.  Their aim was to provide financial software tools such as analytics, an equity trading platform, data services and news to financial companies globally.  At the time the online market for financial information was dominated by Reuters and Telerate who had successfully sold their products to the IT managers of brokerage houses and investment organizations. These purchasers valued standardization of the product above all else because this made installation and management of the systems easier.  Given these needs were so well met by the incumbents it was unclear how Bloomberg might break into the market.

jī opportunity

Bloomberg had other ideas– having worked in the industry he knew that it was the traders and analysts that created the value in the finance houses and that they were the key users of the services.  For them, accuracy and speed of information was far more important than ease of installation. Bloomberg built a proprietary terminal, with 2 screens rather than one, and tailored all services to the needs of the traders and analysts – he then began marketing his product directly to them on a subscription basis.  Bloomberg’s offer was so clearly superior to that of his rivals that the traders and analysts trialed it, and then pressured the IT purchasers to switch across.  Bloomberg also used this deep understanding of its users to begin to offer completely new services, for example enabling them to buy flowers and jewellery from their desks (probably to make amends for working such long hours!).  Bloomberg grew to become one of the largest providers of online financial information in just 15 years.  Incredibly Michael Bloomberg still owns 85% of the group which boasts 100,000 users in the US and 150,000 across the rest of the world.

How About…

  • Questioning the established buying processes in your industry, perhaps shifting your focus from purchasers to users?
  • Offering a physical aspect to a service with a subscription model, claiming valuable real-estate and making your offer stickier?
  • Examining other potential needs of your core users for additional revenue streams?

January 21, 2010

31) Amazon Web Services

amazon web services logo

wēi  danger

Founded in 1994 by Jeff Bezos as a result of his ‘regret minimisation framework’ – an effort to fend off regret for not staking a claim in the Internet gold rush – Amazon has grown to be America’s largest online retailer, with nearly three times the internet sales of its runner up, Staples, Inc. Amazon’s growth has been fueled by continuous innovation of both its retail offer (including moving from books into broader categories and opening up its platform to third-party vendors) and its core technology. Its investment in the latter, mounting to billions of dollars, led it to begin exploring web services in order to help it manage peaks in demand on its website in 2002.  Amazon saw the value in this approach, adopted it internally and continued to build its competence in the area – eventually launching Amazon Web Services in 2006 with a data-storage service, called S3.  However, at the time there was significant concern from industry commentators that the launch was a strategic mistake with key resources, both time and money, likely to be diverted from the retail side of the business.

jī opportunity

However, the move made complete sense to Amazon, which above all else viewed itself as a technology company. It continued to develop its web services offer and has since added additional web based services, including online database, content delivery, and secure payment services – each of these services was born from investment in Amazon.com. The company has also been creative in how it has taken its new services to market, for example in December 2009 it launched a spot market to sell off excess capacity on its EC2 platform which allows enterprises, developers and hosting companies to bid for and buy capacity at prices set by demand and availability.  Although web services represented less than 3% of Amazon’s total revenue as of 2008, the bandwidth (number of bits per unit time) consumed by its Web services division has surpassed the demand from its better known retail websites as of 2007. The offer has helped continuous development of the Amazon platform and has given the company a foothold in some significant emergent markets.

How About…

  • Appraising your internal capabilities for those that might seed completely new offers?
  • Using auction-based pricing in order to price exactly at customers’ willingness to pay?

December 21, 2009

24) Google

google_maps_logo

wēi  danger

Google realized early that location-based services were of real value – the ‘maps’ tab seems to have been on its search page forever.  However, in order to offer complete mapping services Google was dependent on licensing key data from two duopolists that ruled the mapping business – Tele Atlas and NavTeq.  The two companies priced their licenses under strict terms, safe in the knowledge that the barrier to building a database of turn-by-turn directions was huge.  The companies’ positions were apparently so strong that their customers, Tom-Tom and Nokia, bought them for $2.7bn and $8.1bn respectively.

jī opportunity

But, the barrier to entry wasn’t too high for Google to surmount.  After spending years with thousands of cars on the road building its own database the company terminated its license with Tele Atlas earlier this year.  And then Google announced on October 29th that it would offer free navigation with its Android Operating System (OS) – Tele Atlas and NavTeq’s share prices each dropped c20% on the same day.  Google’s business model doesn’t depend on electronic product sales – it depends on advertising revenue.  If widely adopted, its mapping API will create a platform for a global geo-based advertising network.  In fact, Google is so keen for its OS and API to be adopted that it even offers an ad-split to the product and service companies that build with them. ‘Free’ pricing is widely touted as a great way to speed adoption, well Google are effectively offering ‘Less than Free’ (they’re paying).

how about…

  • Questioning barriers to entry that are perceived to be insurmountable?
  • Asking if changes in technology are likely to lower them?
  • Offering products or services for ‘free’ or even ‘less than free’ to speed adoption?